We plan to have more posts on VCAA’s ridiculous curriculum review. Unfortunately.

Now, however, we’ll take a semi-break with three related posts. The nonsensical nature of VCAA’s review stems largely from its cloaking of all discussion in a slavish devotion to “modernity”, from the self-fulfilling prediction of the inevitability of “technology”, and from the presumption that teachers will genuflect to black box authority. We’ll have a post on each of these corrupting influences.

Our first such post is on a quote by Richard Feynman. For another project, and as an antidote to VCAA poison, we’ve been reading *The Character of Physical Law*, Feynman’s brilliant public lectures on physical truth and its discovery. Videos of the lectures are easy to find, and the first lecture is embedded above. Feynman’s purpose in the lectures is to talk very generally about laws in physics, but in order to ground the discussion he devotes his first lecture to just one specific law. Feynman begins this lecture by discussing his possibly surprising choice:

*Now I’ve chosen for my special **example of physical law to tell you **about the theory of gravitation, the phenomena of **gravity. Why I chose gravity, I don’t know. **Whatever I chose you would’ve asked the same question. Actually it was one of **the first great laws to be discovered and it has an interesting history. You might say ‘Yes, but then it’s old hat. I would like to hear something about more modern science’. More recent **perhaps, but not more modern. Modern science is exactly in the same tradition as the discoveries of the law of **gravitation. It is only more recent **discoveries that we would be talking about. And so I do not feel **at all bad about telling you of the law **of gravitation, because in describing its history and the methods, **the character of its discovery and its quality, I am talking about modern science. Completely modern.*

Newer does not mean more modern. Moreover, there can be compelling arguments for focussing upon the old rather than the new. Feynman was perfectly aware of those arguments, of course. Notwithstanding his humorous claim of ignorance, Feynman knew exactly why he chose the law of gravitation.

This could, but will not, lead us into a discussion of VCE physics. It suffices to point out the irony that the clumsy attempts to modernise this subject have shifted it towards the medieval. But the conflation of “recent” with “modern” is of course endemic in ~~modern~~ recent education. We shall just point out one specific effect of this disease on VCE mathematics.

Once upon a time, Victoria had a beautiful Year 12 subject called *Applied Mathematics*. One learned this subject from properly trained teachers and from a beautiful textbook, written by the legendary J. B. “Bernie” Fitzpatrick and the deserves-to-be-legendary Peter Galbraith. Perhaps we’ll devote some future posts on *Applied* and its *Pure* companion. It is enough to note that simply throwing out VCE’s *Methods *and *Specialist* in their entirety and replacing them with dusty old *Pure* and *Applied* would result in a vastly superior, and more modern, curriculum.

Here, we just want to mention one extended topic in that curriculum: dynamics. As it was once taught, dynamics was a deep and incredibly rich topic, a strong and natural reinforcement of calculus and trigonometry and vector algebra, and a stunning demonstration of their power. Such dynamics is “old”, however, and is thus a ready-made target for modernising zealots. And so, over the years this beautiful, coherent and cohering topic has been cut and carved and trivialised, so that in VCE’s *Specialist *all that remains are a few disconnected, meat-free bones.

But, whatever is bad the VCAA can strive to make worse. It is clear that, failing the unlikely event that the current curriculum structure is kept, VCAA’s review will result in dynamics disappearing from VCE mathematics entirely. Forever.

Welcome to the Dark Ages.

Marti,

I am sure Isaac Newton would be happy with Mr Feymann’s choice of topic for his introduction to the Physical

Laws. Fortunately HL IB Physics still has a large section of the curriculum devoted to mechanics,dynamics and kinematics for those who find the proposed VCAA’s curriculum too vanilla.

Hopefully the VCAA can consider the IB curriculum in both Mathematics and Physics as a sensible alternative to the options currently proposed

Steve R

Thanks, Steve. I think IB mathematics gets about one line in the most recent VCAA review, with no indication of the quality of the IB curriculum.