Crikey, it’s Bad

I was a subscriber to Crikey for twenty years, from the very early days of Stephen Mayne and Christian Kerr, AKA Hillary Bray. In those early days, Crikey was feisty, funny and invaluable, providing the daily doses of sanity required to counter the loathsomeness of Kennett and the loathsomeness of Howard.

Mayne and Kerr, and Crikey generally, were not left, and certainly not left enough for me. Both had been conservative political staffers and they leaned towards small government. They had their blind spots. In particular, Kerr absolutely despised the Australian Greens in the manner that is entirely appropriate now but was not then. Or, maybe it was. Maybe Kerr was right about that, too. In any case, Crikey writers were typically thoughtful and clear, you knew what they believed and why. More than anything, Mayne and Kerr were about good governance, of which Australia had, and has, woefully little. Crikey would take on anyone and everyone, seemingly never pulling their punches. They were despised in return, sidelined by pretty much everyone, including the toadying big shot media. I wore my Crikey t shirt with pride. Continue reading “Crikey, it’s Bad” →

Tom’s “Mystery of Formica’s Triangles”

Tom Peachey has posted a mathematical story on his blog: The Mystery of Formica’s Triangles. A draft of this story was also posted on this blog a few years ago, and readers can check out the discussion that followed. Anyway, for this who haven’t read it, Tom’s is a fun Flatlandish story. Go to Tom’s blog and check it out. Continue reading “Tom’s “Mystery of Formica’s Triangles”” →

Jo Boaler’s MATH-ish Boo-Boo

Periodically, someone seeks to beat up Jo Boaler. These beat ups are usually, well, beat-ups. The arguments and evidence tend to be flimsy and to be given the least generous spin. It is also difficult to feel much sympathy for the target. It is Trumpian the manner and frequency with which ill-directed attacks distract from well-directed attacks, all of which Boaler invariably responds to by playing the victim.

Continue reading “Jo Boaler’s MATH-ish Boo-Boo” →

Greg Ashman Gets Explicit

Greg Ashman spends a lot of his time, at his Substack and on Twitter, battling the inquiry clowns. I can’t be bothered. I’m content to just make fun of them. For me, the superiority of explicit teaching or direction instruction or traditional teaching, whatever you want to call it, is so obvious that it is tedious and pointless to try to debate it or to prove it. It is like trying to prove that grass is green. But for Greg, I guess from his being part of the educational psychology world, the nuance matters and the evidence matters. Continue reading “Greg Ashman Gets Explicit” →

The Crowning Experience

Long ago, there was a Los Angeles policewoman who gave it up to become a prostitute. She was then targeted by her former cop colleagues, of course, and she became news. I happened to hear a softball interview with her and, although I don’t remember her being as interesting as promised, she gave one very funny response:

“So what was it like, going from the world of police and lawyers and judges to the world of pimps and johns?”

“Well, for one thing, as a prostitute you meet a better class of people.”

EduTECH24 was the kind of world that made you long to meet a better class of people.

Continue reading “The Crowning Experience” →

A Khan-Do Attitude

Earlier in the week, I found myself at a conference: EduTECH24. Yeah, me neither. Being there felt pretty much like a Jew finding themself at the Vatican.

How I came to be there was pretty weird but it doesn’t much matter; I was there. It meant I could say hi to a couple cherished colleagues, and glare at a couple prominent assholes. And it meant I could observe the selling of edutech. There was a lot of selling. Continue reading “A Khan-Do Attitude” →

The Not-News that is NAPLAN

There’s an old joke. A very sick man is being operated on, but the surgeon is unable to save him and the man dies. The surgeon then has the unpleasant task of informing the waiting wife.

“Tell me Doctor, how is my husband?”

“Well the good news is, his condition is stable.”

The joke came to mind this morning, with the reporting of the just-released 2024 NAPLAN results. The reports everywhere are of the grimness, of “one in three students not meeting standards“, of the “NAPLAN mediocrity“, of “the new lows“, of the “epic fail“, and on and on and on. ACARA, however, had a different take. Continue reading “The Not-News that is NAPLAN” →

In Praise of Dunlop Volleys

Once, very long ago, I used to be a decent squash player. Not remotely a pro or a rep or anything of the sort, but pretty good. The thing about squash is that once the play is at a high enough level it is very difficult to hit a winning shot and the game becomes a war of attrition. So, if you’re sufficiently stubborn and simply refuse to give in then you can do pretty well. People may not realise this about me, but being stubborn and refusing to give in is kind of my forte. Continue reading “In Praise of Dunlop Volleys” →

VCAA’s Recipe For Examination Improvement

Is it just me? Was everybody else already aware that VCAA’s logo is a Penrose triangle?

Anyway, VCAA has published a webpage, outlining what they have done and are planning to do in response to the Bennett review. The page outlines VCAA’s adjustments to accord with Bennett’s recommendations, and includes links to previous relevant notices and the like.

Will this be the difference? We’ll have to see, and of course the proof will be in the pudding. But at least VCAA appears to have a pudding recipe. It is a start, at least.