(The preamble for this post is now a post-amble, at the end.)

**(16/10/21) **Two questions have been added to the Specialist Error List, and one to the Methods Error List. Continue reading “The Update Post”

Skip to content
# Tag: WitCH

## The Update Post

## WitCH 67: Rooted

## UPDATE (29/08/21)

## WitCH 66: Bad Pipe Dream

## WitCH 65: Repeat Offender

## WitCH 64: Decreasing Intelligence

## WitCH 63: A Separate Reality

## WitCH 62: Video Killed the Proficiency Star

**UPDATE (01/06/21)**

## WitCH 59: Stretching the Truth

## WitCH 58: Differently Abled

## WitCH 57: Tunnel Vision

(The preamble for this post is now a post-amble, at the end.)

**(16/10/21) **Two questions have been added to the Specialist Error List, and one to the Methods Error List. Continue reading “The Update Post”

Our final 2021 NHT WitCH is the final question from the Specialist Exam 1.

Sigh. We *really* hate updating WitCHes.* We have about a hundred of these things to do, and we’re generally thinking of the updating as a task for retirement or, better, for a reincarnation. However these NHT WitCHes, and this one in particular, have highlighted a degree of confusion. So, alas, it seems worthwhile sorting out the issues while the issues are in mind.

This our final WitCH from the 2021 NHT Methods Exam 2. It is, in its own way, a masterpiece. Continue reading “WitCH 66: Bad Pipe Dream”

The following is our second WitCH from the 2021 NHT Methods Exam 2.

Just in case anybody got the wrong impression and hoped or feared we’d turned over a new leaf, we’ll be posting a number of WitCHes in the next few days. We’ve finally had a chance to look at the 2021 NHT exams (although the exam reports have still not appeared). As usual, the exams are clunky and eccentric, and we’ll be posting a brief question-by-question overview of the exams. But, first, some highlights. Continue reading “WitCH 64: Decreasing Intelligence”

The following comes courtesy of frequent commenter, John Friend. It is an exercise and solution from *Cambridge Specialist Mathematics 3&4*.

It’s not fun, but we gotta do it.

Yesterday, we wrote about Ofsted’s review of mathematics education. We wrote that it is a great review, and it is a great review. It is perfect in its reactionaryism. But, alas, there’s also a video.

Below is Hannah Stoten, one of the review authors and future kidnap victim, launching the review. An excellent review, and a well-spoken author. What could go wrong?

Well, that’s not good:

Nonetheless, we’re willing to assume that Hannah is innocent here, and plans to kidnap her and bring her to Australia are proceeding apace.

This double-barrelled WitCH comes from *Maths Quest Mathematical Methods 11* (top). and *Cambridge Mathematical Methods 1 & 2* (bottom). It is the final in our series of Quest-bashing, at least for now.

Like the previous post, this one comes from *Maths Quest Mathematical Methods 11*, and is most definitely a WitCH. It can also been seen as a “contrast and compare” with WitCH 15.

Subsection 13.2.5, below, is on “differentiability”. The earlier part of chapter 13 gives a potted, and not error-free, introduction to limits and continuity, and Chapter 12 covers the “first principles” (limit) computation of polynomial derivatives. We’ve included the relevant “worked example”, and the relevant exercises and answers.

The following is just a dumb exercise, and so is probably more of a PoSWW. It seems so lemmingly stupid, however, that it comes around full cycle to be a WitCH. It is an exercise from *Maths Quest Mathematical Methods 11*. The exercise appears in a pre-calculus, CAS-permitted chapter, *Cubic Polynomials*. The suggested answers are (a) , and (b) 81/32 km.